RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02848
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (first-term, second term or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be upgraded so that he can
reenlist in the US Marine Corps (USMC).
________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He has no intentions of reenlisting in the Air Force; however,
by upgrading his RE code to a 1 he will be able to enlist in
the USMC.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 22 Jun 10, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of airman basic (AB/E-1).
On 11 Jan 12, he received Article 15 punishment for disobeying a
lawful order. On 1 May 12, his suspended punishment was
implemented for being absent from work on 11 Mar 12, from
2300 to 2340. The applicant's commander stated on his AF Form
418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for
Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, dated
2 May 12, that he had been counseled numerous times for being
late to work and proper use of his chain of command.
On 29 Sep 12, the applicant was honorably separated with a
reason for separation of completion of required active service,
with a RE code of 2X, in the grade of AB. He was credited with
2 years, 3 months, and 8 days of active duty service.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA states that the RE code of
2X is correct.
The applicant was separated under the AF Force Shaping Program
after serving 2 years, 3 months, and 8 days with an honorable
character of service. On 2 May 12, the applicant's commander
non-selected him for reenlistment. On 3 May 12, the applicant
acknowledged receipt of the non-selection and rendered his
intent not to appeal.
AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states that commanders
have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection
authority. The SRP considers the members Enlisted Performance
Report (EPR) ratings, Unfavorable Information from any
substantiated source, the airman's willingness to comply with
Air Force standards and/or the airman's ability (or lack of) to
meet required training and duty performance levels. The
applicant does not provide any proof of an error or injustice in
reference to his RE code, but wants to rejoin the military.
The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 23 Aug 13 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. At the time
members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an
RE code predicated upon the circumstances of their separation.
The applicants RE code of 2X accurately reflects that he was
considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP.
Therefore, after thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record,
and given the circumstances surrounding his separation, we find
the RE code was issued in accordance with the governing
directives and we find no basis to disturb the existing record.
In view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-02848 in Executive Session on 3 Apr 13, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Jun 13.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 18 Jul 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Aug 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03414
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial stating, in part, the applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant a change of his RE code. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances of their separation. ________________________________________________________________ The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00657
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00657 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2X, which denotes "1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)," be changed to 3K, which denotes Reserved for Use by AFPC or AFBCMR, to...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00009
The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 24 Jan 14, for a period of three years. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPRs), which are attached at Exhibits C, D, E, and F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPTOS recommends denial with respect to the applicants request for his lost time to be reinstated. A complete copy of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00165
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00165 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to 1M (Eligible to reenlist, second-term or career airmen not yet...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05961
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05961 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (Career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program), as reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow him to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05961
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05961 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2X (Career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program), as reflected on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed to allow him to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05892
AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders have selective reenlistment selection or nonselection authority. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04867
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04867 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under SRP) be changed to allow him to reenlist. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04106
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04106 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the SRP, be changed to allow him to reenter the military. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03451
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. In accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. ...